Best Known (58, 104, s)-Nets in Base 9
(58, 104, 320)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (58, 104, 320)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (58, 106, 320)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 53, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 53, 160)-net over F81, using
(58, 104, 380)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (58, 104, 380)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 52, 190)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 189)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 190, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 189)-sequence over F81, using
(58, 104, 24319)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (58, 104, 24320)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1743 546666 437826 101333 699429 025304 546170 558501 160385 749360 309101 818525 577495 368818 685077 351881 156609 > 9104 [i]