Best Known (26, 105, s)-Nets in Base 9
(26, 105, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 105, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 105, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(26, 105, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (26, 105, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
(26, 105, 650)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 105, 651)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 104, 651)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1755 847860 501948 554619 478760 718125 949969 003337 232313 026985 174585 705916 838603 940527 412453 473045 442537 > 9104 [i]