Best Known (54, 113, s)-Nets in Base 9
(54, 113, 114)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 113, 114)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 37, 40)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 76, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (8, 37, 40)-net over F9, using
(54, 113, 184)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (54, 113, 184)-net over F9, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(9113, 184, F9, 3, 59) (dual of [(184, 3), 439, 60]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(3;F,483P) ⊂ AG(3;F,488P) [i] based on
- linear OOA(9109, 181, F9, 3, 59) (dual of [(181, 3), 434, 60]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(3;F,483P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
- linear OOA(9104, 181, F9, 3, 54) (dual of [(181, 3), 439, 55]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(3;F,488P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182 (see above)
- linear OOA(94, 3, F9, 3, 4) (dual of [(3, 3), 5, 5]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(94, 9, F9, 3, 4) (dual of [(9, 3), 23, 5]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(3;23,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(94, 9, F9, 3, 4) (dual of [(9, 3), 23, 5]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(3;F,483P) ⊂ AG(3;F,488P) [i] based on
(54, 113, 7051)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 113, 7052)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (54, 112, 7052)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 75083 165381 665427 399643 052798 449093 872577 460665 855862 731518 385699 054509 366509 638797 624269 018015 276265 030625 > 9112 [i]