Best Known (48, 117, s)-Nets in Base 9
(48, 117, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 117, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 117, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(48, 117, 88)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive
(48, 117, 88)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 88)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 87)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 88, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 87)-sequence over F27, using
(48, 117, 163)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (48, 117, 163)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 162)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 48 and N(F) ≥ 163, using
(48, 117, 3027)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 117, 3028)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 116, 3028)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 495 262411 583729 845074 250303 840581 548574 475761 518813 249947 708580 188429 692635 033475 204328 476532 709381 628397 671873 > 9116 [i]