Best Known (58, 117, s)-Nets in Base 9
(58, 117, 128)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (58, 117, 128)-net over F9, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (58, 122, 128)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 45, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 77, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9 (see above)
- digital (13, 45, 64)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(58, 117, 217)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (58, 117, 217)-net over F9, using
(58, 117, 9554)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (58, 117, 9555)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (58, 116, 9555)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 493 126669 864481 855498 872990 198661 654548 805183 630494 488992 185041 495194 254430 917378 330602 829970 632610 972087 738425 > 9116 [i]