Best Known (66, 120, s)-Nets in Base 9
(66, 120, 320)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (66, 120, 320)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (66, 122, 320)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 61, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 61, 160)-net over F81, using
(66, 120, 380)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (66, 120, 380)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 60, 190)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 189)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 190, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 189)-sequence over F81, using
(66, 120, 23773)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (66, 120, 23774)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3 230576 101722 085775 280820 696924 890477 373575 372260 464374 116899 871590 544234 436012 380167 553350 696407 116694 325062 190865 > 9120 [i]