MinT - Best Known (93, 123, s)-Nets in Base 9

Best Known (93, 123, s)-Nets in Base 9

(93, 123, 904)-Net over F₉ — Constructive and digital

Digital (93, 123, 904)-net over F₉, using

1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 124, 904)-net over F₉, using
- (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
  1. digital (15, 30, 164)-net over F₉, using
    - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 15, 82)-net over F₈₁, using
      - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F₈₁, using
        generalized Faure sequence [i]
        Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈₁ with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
        the rational function field F₈₁(x) [i]
        Niederreiter sequence [i]
  2. digital (63, 94, 740)-net over F₉, using
    - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 47, 370)-net over F₈₁, using
      - net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F₈₁, using
        Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈₁ with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
        a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(93, 123, 16282)-Net over F₉ — Digital

Digital (93, 123, 16282)-net over F₉, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(93, 123, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s

There is no (93, 123, large)-net in base 9, because

28 times m-reduction [i] would yield (93, 95, large)-net in base 9, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]