Best Known (87, 124, s)-Nets in Base 9
(87, 124, 750)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (87, 124, 750)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 18, 10)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 9)-sequence over F9, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- the rational function field F9(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 9)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (69, 106, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 53, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 53, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (0, 18, 10)-net over F9, using
(87, 124, 3473)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (87, 124, 3473)-net over F9, using
(87, 124, 3131091)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (87, 124, 3131092)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (87, 123, 3131092)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 2354 130308 580992 723184 480396 311170 812344 088240 862831 320009 801170 463168 720072 740658 328499 691191 064443 492589 855904 518081 > 9123 [i]