Best Known (61, 126, s)-Nets in Base 9
(61, 126, 128)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 126, 128)-net over F9, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (61, 131, 128)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 48, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 83, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9 (see above)
- digital (13, 48, 64)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(61, 126, 209)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (61, 126, 209)-net over F9, using
(61, 126, 8517)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 126, 8518)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (61, 125, 8518)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 191103 818119 916408 116549 768430 147566 160276 460752 297595 911790 213115 876429 203999 838196 347801 952244 498946 474910 189119 992321 > 9125 [i]