Best Known (89, 127, s)-Nets in Base 9
(89, 127, 750)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 127, 750)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 19, 10)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 9)-sequence over F9, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- the rational function field F9(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 9)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (70, 108, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 54, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 54, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (0, 19, 10)-net over F9, using
(89, 127, 3471)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (89, 127, 3471)-net over F9, using
(89, 127, 2368542)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 127, 2368543)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 15 445392 822139 145159 894298 137029 394177 638897 052272 708772 065306 938158 101642 957938 404218 806578 036032 690395 954031 144178 837097 > 9127 [i]