Best Known (36, 131, s)-Nets in Base 9
(36, 131, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 131, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 131, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(36, 131, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (36, 131, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 131, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(36, 131, 972)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 131, 973)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 130, 973)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11638 330213 182643 016740 342422 394640 280891 800200 428548 079916 620036 034607 844630 907136 376957 739596 716769 133278 075277 831459 196889 > 9130 [i]