Best Known (50, 131, s)-Nets in Base 9
(50, 131, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 131, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 131, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(50, 131, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (50, 131, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
(50, 131, 2464)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 131, 2465)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (50, 130, 2465)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11374 893867 082782 341352 786776 298709 402283 668391 464183 341478 731607 441220 195999 273513 816834 877196 402211 622044 486474 446146 841665 > 9130 [i]