Best Known (101, 134, s)-Nets in Base 9
(101, 134, 972)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (101, 134, 972)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (20, 36, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 116)-net over F81, using
- digital (65, 98, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 49, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 49, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (20, 36, 232)-net over F9, using
(101, 134, 15853)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (101, 134, 15853)-net over F9, using
(101, 134, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (101, 134, large)-net in base 9, because
- 31 times m-reduction [i] would yield (101, 103, large)-net in base 9, but