Best Known (46, 134, s)-Nets in Base 9
(46, 134, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 134, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 134, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(46, 134, 162)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (46, 134, 162)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (46, 161)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 46 and N(F) ≥ 162, using
(46, 134, 1710)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 134, 1711)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 74 508643 325315 967313 570154 309745 701994 175892 130252 141773 633164 611092 213928 067896 807204 275548 088955 234446 818589 919313 267201 352865 > 9134 [i]