Best Known (48, 135, s)-Nets in Base 9
(48, 135, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 135, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 135, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(48, 135, 163)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (48, 135, 163)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 162)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 48 and N(F) ≥ 163, using
(48, 135, 1960)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 135, 1961)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 134, 1961)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 75 300122 956598 415892 456742 397247 298582 885184 143140 544918 731243 488234 251361 106106 440176 224145 008668 848081 692935 278006 364461 502425 > 9134 [i]