Best Known (46, 139, s)-Nets in Base 9
(46, 139, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 139, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 139, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(46, 139, 162)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (46, 139, 162)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (46, 161)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 46 and N(F) ≥ 162, using
(46, 139, 1611)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 139, 1612)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 138, 1612)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 484962 775363 166858 175919 642985 911030 725962 760389 835362 927769 582036 685439 268654 256165 572976 849379 446806 702193 449793 102181 278636 846017 > 9138 [i]