Best Known (53, 142, s)-Nets in Base 9
(53, 142, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (53, 142, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 142, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(53, 142, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (53, 142, 182)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 142, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
(53, 142, 2437)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (53, 142, 2438)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (53, 141, 2438)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 355 333132 087975 557065 722831 525177 839577 896749 099326 114337 931416 301440 936895 749402 086626 323219 683545 987215 179414 728403 467459 830675 390145 > 9141 [i]