Best Known (112, 145, s)-Nets in Base 9
(112, 145, 1460)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (112, 145, 1460)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (111, 145, 1460)-net over F9, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (111, 150, 1460)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (36, 75, 730)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 729)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 36 and N(F) ≥ 730, using
- the Hermitian function field over F81 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 36 and N(F) ≥ 730, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 729)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (36, 75, 730)-net over F81, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (111, 150, 1460)-net over F9, using
(112, 145, 33721)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (112, 145, 33721)-net over F9, using
(112, 145, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (112, 145, large)-net in base 9, because
- 31 times m-reduction [i] would yield (112, 114, large)-net in base 9, but