Best Known (55, 146, s)-Nets in Base 9
(55, 146, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (55, 146, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 146, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(55, 146, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (55, 146, 182)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 146, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
(55, 146, 2589)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (55, 146, 2590)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (55, 145, 2590)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 2 325074 848722 595437 004327 290422 711765 180505 915813 848451 931020 649511 965139 034093 513823 861310 929255 249798 915010 378222 303542 395502 234574 408113 > 9145 [i]