Best Known (109, 147, s)-Nets in Base 9
(109, 147, 904)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (109, 147, 904)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (109, 148, 904)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (19, 38, 164)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 19, 82)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- the rational function field F81(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 19, 82)-net over F81, using
- digital (71, 110, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 55, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 55, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (19, 38, 164)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(109, 147, 11342)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (109, 147, 11342)-net over F9, using
(109, 147, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (109, 147, large)-net in base 9, because
- 36 times m-reduction [i] would yield (109, 111, large)-net in base 9, but