Best Known (66, 148, s)-Nets in Base 9
(66, 148, 165)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (66, 148, 165)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (64, 148, 165)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- T4 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
(66, 148, 192)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (66, 148, 192)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (61, 148, 192)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
(66, 148, 5590)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (66, 148, 5591)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1694 585540 766220 413821 697019 310640 411229 341850 743304 805081 527950 315983 314097 728651 616958 156452 316305 706691 659299 521551 584952 551815 410287 099769 > 9148 [i]