Best Known (102, 149, s)-Nets in Base 9
(102, 149, 750)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (102, 149, 750)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 23, 10)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 9)-sequence over F9, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- the rational function field F9(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 9)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (79, 126, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 63, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 63, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (0, 23, 10)-net over F9, using
(102, 149, 2797)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (102, 149, 2797)-net over F9, using
(102, 149, 1628192)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (102, 149, 1628193)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (102, 148, 1628193)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1690 035037 993816 230922 441142 971463 307504 754841 495892 552850 915234 437026 399955 577022 473108 485164 502787 687087 492050 787792 079866 175590 982270 294265 > 9148 [i]