Best Known (108, 149, s)-Nets in Base 9
(108, 149, 804)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (108, 149, 804)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (108, 150, 804)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 34, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (74, 116, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 58, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 58, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (13, 34, 64)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(108, 149, 7087)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (108, 149, 7087)-net over F9, using
(108, 149, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (108, 149, large)-net in base 9, because
- 39 times m-reduction [i] would yield (108, 110, large)-net in base 9, but