Best Known (17, 28, s)-Nets in Base 9
(17, 28, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (17, 28, 232)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (17, 30, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 15, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 15, 116)-net over F81, using
(17, 28, 373)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (17, 28, 373)-net over F9, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(928, 373, F9, 11) (dual of [373, 345, 12]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(928, 728, F9, 11) (dual of [728, 700, 12]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 93−1, defining interval I = [0,10], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 12 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(928, 728, F9, 11) (dual of [728, 700, 12]-code), using
(17, 28, 46305)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (17, 28, 46306)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (17, 27, 46306)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 58 153802 453854 533620 966097 > 927 [i]