Best Known (21, 36, s)-Nets in Base 9
(21, 36, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (21, 36, 232)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (21, 38, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 19, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 19, 116)-net over F81, using
(21, 36, 272)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (21, 36, 272)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 18, 136)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
(21, 36, 24944)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (21, 36, 24945)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (21, 35, 24945)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 2503 549127 366571 930286 639619 100153 > 935 [i]