Best Known (41, 58, s)-Nets in Base 9
(41, 58, 464)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (41, 58, 464)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (12, 20, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 10, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 10, 116)-net over F81, using
- digital (21, 38, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 19, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 19, 116)-net over F81, using
- digital (12, 20, 232)-net over F9, using
(41, 58, 2455)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (41, 58, 2455)-net over F9, using
(41, 58, 2961947)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (41, 58, 2961948)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (41, 57, 2961948)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 2 465040 671035 817820 095777 718704 857724 847799 814863 864065 > 957 [i]