Best Known (33, 62, s)-Nets in Base 9
(33, 62, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 62, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 31, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
(33, 62, 236)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (33, 62, 236)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 31, 118)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 118, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
(33, 62, 10859)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 62, 10860)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 61, 10860)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 16183 970084 051005 037099 485468 336277 257647 594941 887264 117185 > 961 [i]