Best Known (42, 73, s)-Nets in Base 9
(42, 73, 320)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (42, 73, 320)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (42, 74, 320)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 37, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 37, 160)-net over F81, using
(42, 73, 334)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (42, 73, 334)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (42, 74, 334)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 37, 167)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 166)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 167, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 166)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 37, 167)-net over F81, using
(42, 73, 30543)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (42, 73, 30544)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (42, 72, 30544)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 507 728187 000028 563282 182652 380999 781589 401377 696417 646796 003181 553537 > 972 [i]