Best Known (47, 76, s)-Nets in Base 9
(47, 76, 344)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (47, 76, 344)-net over F9, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (47, 80, 344)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 40, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 40, 172)-net over F81, using
(47, 76, 596)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (47, 76, 596)-net over F9, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(976, 596, F9, 29) (dual of [596, 520, 30]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(976, 728, F9, 29) (dual of [728, 652, 30]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 93−1, defining interval I = [0,28], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 30 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(976, 728, F9, 29) (dual of [728, 652, 30]-code), using
(47, 76, 97801)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (47, 76, 97802)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (47, 75, 97802)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 370026 321084 402523 999119 989661 753262 002224 690309 543309 311742 793763 395489 > 975 [i]