Best Known (33, 78, s)-Nets in Base 9
(33, 78, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 78, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 78, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(33, 78, 82)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive
(33, 78, 82)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 52, 82)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F27, using
(33, 78, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (33, 78, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
(33, 78, 2461)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 78, 2462)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 77, 2462)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 29 974418 800345 392850 214124 300159 674981 130907 585115 437357 474647 614937 502305 > 977 [i]