Best Known (42, 79, s)-Nets in Base 9
(42, 79, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (42, 79, 232)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (42, 80, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 40, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 40, 116)-net over F81, using
(42, 79, 236)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (42, 79, 236)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (42, 80, 236)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 40, 118)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 118, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 40, 118)-net over F81, using
(42, 79, 12874)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (42, 79, 12875)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (42, 78, 12875)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 269 930352 342576 966392 330079 905479 287828 231073 604359 555722 507316 941780 442801 > 978 [i]