Best Known (46, 79, s)-Nets in Base 9
(46, 79, 320)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 79, 320)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (46, 82, 320)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 41, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 41, 160)-net over F81, using
(46, 79, 380)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (46, 79, 380)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (46, 80, 380)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 40, 190)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 189)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 190, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 189)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 40, 190)-net over F81, using
(46, 79, 38130)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 79, 38131)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 78, 38131)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 269 775297 608101 068752 152275 579309 103977 153158 185436 176275 246027 697772 076417 > 978 [i]