Best Known (32, 89, s)-Nets in Base 9
(32, 89, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 89, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
(32, 89, 120)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (32, 89, 120)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (31, 89, 120)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 119)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 119)-sequence over F9, using
(32, 89, 1392)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 89, 1393)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 88, 1393)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 954974 387588 584331 158643 627075 214465 297213 605366 238867 704049 567420 549898 873276 951905 > 988 [i]