Best Known (34, 89, s)-Nets in Base 9
(34, 89, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 89, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 89, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(34, 89, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (34, 89, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 89, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(34, 89, 1743)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 89, 1744)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 88, 1744)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 949481 673611 546593 475882 340382 122299 565998 410722 831942 762831 754066 369906 065547 617665 > 988 [i]