Best Known (39, 90, s)-Nets in Base 9
(39, 90, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (39, 90, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 90, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(39, 90, 88)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive
(39, 90, 88)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 60, 88)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 87)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 88, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 87)-sequence over F27, using
(39, 90, 140)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (39, 90, 140)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
(39, 90, 3159)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (39, 90, 3160)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (39, 89, 3160)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8 522193 357281 854451 606299 520463 078376 504379 852967 539863 395348 556096 546964 787877 013697 > 989 [i]