Best Known (83, 99, s)-Nets in Base 9
(83, 99, 597872)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (83, 99, 597872)-net over F9, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(999, 597872, F9, 16, 16) (dual of [(597872, 16), 9565853, 17]-NRT-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(999, 4782976, F9, 16) (dual of [4782976, 4782877, 17]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(15) ⊂ Ce(14) [i] based on
- linear OA(999, 4782969, F9, 16) (dual of [4782969, 4782870, 17]-code), using an extension Ce(15) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4782968 = 97−1, defining interval I = [1,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- linear OA(992, 4782969, F9, 15) (dual of [4782969, 4782877, 16]-code), using an extension Ce(14) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4782968 = 97−1, defining interval I = [1,14], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 15 [i]
- linear OA(90, 7, F9, 0) (dual of [7, 7, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(90, s, F9, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(15) ⊂ Ce(14) [i] based on
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(999, 4782976, F9, 16) (dual of [4782976, 4782877, 17]-code), using
(83, 99, 3614634)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (83, 99, 3614634)-net over F9, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(999, 3614634, F9, 16) (dual of [3614634, 3614535, 17]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(999, 4782969, F9, 16) (dual of [4782969, 4782870, 17]-code), using
- an extension Ce(15) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4782968 = 97−1, defining interval I = [1,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(999, 4782969, F9, 16) (dual of [4782969, 4782870, 17]-code), using
(83, 99, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (83, 99, large)-net in base 9, because
- 14 times m-reduction [i] would yield (83, 85, large)-net in base 9, but