Information on Result #1027421
Linear OOA(4253, 86, F4, 3, 211) (dual of [(86, 3), 5, 212]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(410, 5, F4, 3, 10) (dual of [(5, 3), 5, 11]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(3;5,4) [i]
- linear OOA(4238, 81, F4, 3, 200) (dual of [(81, 3), 5, 201]-NRT-code), using
- 9 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(4247, 84, F4, 3, 209) (dual of [(84, 3), 5, 210]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 6 times [i] based on linear OOA(437, 14, F4, 3, 34) (dual of [(14, 3), 5, 35]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(3;F,7P) [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- repeating each code word 6 times [i] based on linear OOA(437, 14, F4, 3, 34) (dual of [(14, 3), 5, 35]-NRT-code), using
- 9 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(4247, 84, F4, 3, 209) (dual of [(84, 3), 5, 210]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OOA(4253, 86, F4, 3, 210) (dual of [(86, 3), 5, 211]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
2 | Linear OOA(4253, 86, F4, 3, 209) (dual of [(86, 3), 5, 210]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | Linear OOA(4253, 86, F4, 3, 208) (dual of [(86, 3), 5, 209]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
4 | Linear OOA(4253, 86, F4, 3, 207) (dual of [(86, 3), 5, 208]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
5 | Linear OOA(4253, 86, F4, 3, 206) (dual of [(86, 3), 5, 207]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
6 | Linear OOA(4253, 86, F4, 3, 205) (dual of [(86, 3), 5, 206]-NRT-code) | [i] |