Information on Result #1040548
Linear OOA(8102, 69, F8, 3, 81) (dual of [(69, 3), 105, 82]-NRT-code), using construction X applied to AG(3;F,110P) ⊂ AG(3;F,118P) based on
- linear OOA(895, 64, F8, 3, 81) (dual of [(64, 3), 97, 82]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(3;F,110P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- linear OOA(887, 64, F8, 3, 73) (dual of [(64, 3), 105, 74]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(3;F,118P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
- linear OOA(87, 5, F8, 3, 7) (dual of [(5, 3), 8, 8]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(87, 8, F8, 3, 7) (dual of [(8, 3), 17, 8]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(3;17,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(87, 8, F8, 3, 7) (dual of [(8, 3), 17, 8]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OOA(8102, 69, F8, 3, 80) (dual of [(69, 3), 105, 81]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
2 | Linear OOA(8156, 134, F8, 3, 81) (dual of [(134, 3), 246, 82]-NRT-code) | [i] | (u, u+v)-Construction for OOAs | |
3 | Linear OOA(8160, 136, F8, 3, 81) (dual of [(136, 3), 248, 82]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
4 | Linear OOA(8162, 137, F8, 3, 81) (dual of [(137, 3), 249, 82]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
5 | Linear OOA(8163, 138, F8, 3, 81) (dual of [(138, 3), 251, 82]-NRT-code) | [i] |