Information on Result #1288581

Linear OA(2164, 200, F2, 63) (dual of [200, 36, 64]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
  1. linear OA(1616, 25, F16, 15) (dual of [25, 9, 16]-code), using
  2. linear OA(24, 8, F2, 3) (dual of [8, 4, 4]-code or 8-cap in PG(3,2)), using

Mode: Linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(2164, 200, F2, 62) (dual of [200, 36, 63]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(2164, 200, F2, 61) (dual of [200, 36, 62]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(2164, 200, F2, 60) (dual of [200, 36, 61]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(2165, 201, F2, 63) (dual of [201, 36, 64]-code) [i]Code Embedding in Larger Space
5Linear OA(2166, 202, F2, 63) (dual of [202, 36, 64]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(2167, 203, F2, 63) (dual of [203, 36, 64]-code) [i]
7Linear OA(2168, 204, F2, 63) (dual of [204, 36, 64]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(2169, 205, F2, 63) (dual of [205, 36, 64]-code) [i]
9Linear OA(2170, 206, F2, 63) (dual of [206, 36, 64]-code) [i]
10Linear OA(2163, 199, F2, 62) (dual of [199, 36, 63]-code) [i]Truncation
11Linear OA(2162, 198, F2, 61) (dual of [198, 36, 62]-code) [i]