Information on Result #1297388
Linear OA(2212, 229, F2, 92) (dual of [229, 17, 93]-code), using construction X with Varšamov bound based on
- linear OA(2196, 212, F2, 92) (dual of [212, 16, 93]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(2197, 213, F2, 93) (dual of [213, 16, 94]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(463, 71, F4, 46) (dual of [71, 8, 47]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(464, 72, F4, 47) (dual of [72, 8, 48]-code), using
- linear OA(21, 3, F2, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(463, 71, F4, 46) (dual of [71, 8, 47]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(2197, 213, F2, 93) (dual of [213, 16, 94]-code), using
- linear OA(2196, 213, F2, 76) (dual of [213, 17, 77]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 2196 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 81258 283719 296269 013004 343732 066295 280433 720858 926785 780278 [i]
- linear OA(215, 16, F2, 15) (dual of [16, 1, 16]-code or 16-arc in PG(14,2)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 16 [i]
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.