Information on Result #1298136
Linear OA(380, 118, F3, 33) (dual of [118, 38, 34]-code), using construction X with Varšamov bound based on
- linear OA(376, 112, F3, 33) (dual of [112, 36, 34]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2716, 28, F27, 16) (dual of [28, 12, 17]-code or 28-arc in PG(15,27)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(12,27) [i]
- linear OA(31, 4, F3, 1) (dual of [4, 3, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(31, s, F3, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(2716, 28, F27, 16) (dual of [28, 12, 17]-code or 28-arc in PG(15,27)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(376, 114, F3, 30) (dual of [114, 38, 31]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 376 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 491922 601079 277507 599361 395922 901059 [i]
- linear OA(32, 4, F3, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,3)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,3) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,3) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,3) [i]
- the Tetracode [i]
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.