Information on Result #1298722
Linear OA(3154, 177, F3, 76) (dual of [177, 23, 77]-code), using construction X with Varšamov bound based on
- linear OA(3150, 171, F3, 77) (dual of [171, 21, 78]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2712, 19, F27, 12) (dual of [19, 7, 13]-code or 19-arc in PG(11,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2712, 27, F27, 12) (dual of [27, 15, 13]-code or 27-arc in PG(11,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(15,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2712, 27, F27, 12) (dual of [27, 15, 13]-code or 27-arc in PG(11,27)), using
- linear OA(36, 9, F3, 5) (dual of [9, 3, 6]-code), using
- linear OA(2712, 19, F27, 12) (dual of [19, 7, 13]-code or 19-arc in PG(11,27)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(3150, 173, F3, 73) (dual of [173, 23, 74]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 3150 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 272203 130876 437500 356148 088609 178686 773985 064087 300580 684130 017775 996017 [i]
- linear OA(32, 4, F3, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,3)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,3) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,3) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,3) [i]
- the Tetracode [i]
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.