Information on Result #1298761
Linear OA(3159, 185, F3, 77) (dual of [185, 26, 78]-code), using construction X with Varšamov bound based on
- linear OA(3156, 180, F3, 77) (dual of [180, 24, 78]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2712, 20, F27, 12) (dual of [20, 8, 13]-code or 20-arc in PG(11,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2712, 27, F27, 12) (dual of [27, 15, 13]-code or 27-arc in PG(11,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(15,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2712, 27, F27, 12) (dual of [27, 15, 13]-code or 27-arc in PG(11,27)), using
- linear OA(36, 9, F3, 5) (dual of [9, 3, 6]-code), using
- linear OA(2712, 20, F27, 12) (dual of [20, 8, 13]-code or 20-arc in PG(11,27)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(3156, 182, F3, 75) (dual of [182, 26, 76]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 3156 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 256 015770 691635 852283 934166 628652 916549 843567 477760 574778 388465 337037 050931 [i]
- linear OA(31, 3, F3, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(31, s, F3, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OA(3160, 187, F3, 77) (dual of [187, 27, 78]-code) | [i] | Construction X with Varšamov Bound |