Information on Result #1298898
Linear OA(3178, 203, F3, 89) (dual of [203, 25, 90]-code), using construction X with Varšamov bound based on
- linear OA(3174, 198, F3, 89) (dual of [198, 24, 90]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2714, 22, F27, 14) (dual of [22, 8, 15]-code or 22-arc in PG(13,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2714, 27, F27, 14) (dual of [27, 13, 15]-code or 27-arc in PG(13,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(13,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2714, 27, F27, 14) (dual of [27, 13, 15]-code or 27-arc in PG(13,27)), using
- linear OA(36, 9, F3, 5) (dual of [9, 3, 6]-code), using
- linear OA(2714, 22, F27, 14) (dual of [22, 8, 15]-code or 22-arc in PG(13,27)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(3174, 199, F3, 85) (dual of [199, 25, 86]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 3174 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 71166 126229 350998 683853 382001 233875 964440 693372 399052 809519 886047 330449 621505 515993 [i]
- linear OA(33, 4, F3, 3) (dual of [4, 1, 4]-code or 4-arc in PG(2,3) or 4-cap in PG(2,3)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 4 [i]
- oval in PG(2, 3) [i]
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.