Information on Result #1304452
Linear OA(374, 125, F3, 28) (dual of [125, 51, 29]-code), using 9 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0) based on linear OA(369, 111, F3, 28) (dual of [111, 42, 29]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(370, 112, F3, 29) (dual of [112, 42, 30]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2714, 28, F27, 14) (dual of [28, 14, 15]-code or 28-arc in PG(13,27)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(14,27) [i]
- linear OA(31, 4, F3, 1) (dual of [4, 3, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(31, s, F3, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(2714, 28, F27, 14) (dual of [28, 14, 15]-code or 28-arc in PG(13,27)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.