Information on Result #1306983
Linear OA(3185, 224, F3, 85) (dual of [224, 39, 86]-code), using 7 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1) based on linear OA(3175, 207, F3, 85) (dual of [207, 32, 86]-code), using
- 37 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(3212, 244, F3, 122) (dual of [244, 32, 123]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(121) ⊂ Ce(120) [i] based on
- linear OA(3212, 243, F3, 122) (dual of [243, 31, 123]-code), using an extension Ce(121) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = [1,121], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 122 [i]
- linear OA(3211, 243, F3, 121) (dual of [243, 32, 122]-code), using an extension Ce(120) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = [1,120], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 121 [i]
- linear OA(30, 1, F3, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(30, s, F3, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(121) ⊂ Ce(120) [i] based on
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.