Information on Result #1314090
Linear OA(1680, 292, F16, 41) (dual of [292, 212, 42]-code), using 26 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (4, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 12 times 0) based on linear OA(1673, 259, F16, 41) (dual of [259, 186, 42]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([254,38]), C2 = C([0,39]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,38]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([254,39]) [i] based on
- linear OA(1671, 255, F16, 40) (dual of [255, 184, 41]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 162−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,38}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 41 [i]
- linear OA(1671, 255, F16, 40) (dual of [255, 184, 41]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 162−1, defining interval I = [0,39], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 41 [i]
- linear OA(1673, 255, F16, 41) (dual of [255, 182, 42]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 162−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,39}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 42 [i]
- linear OA(1669, 255, F16, 39) (dual of [255, 186, 40]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 162−1, defining interval I = [0,38], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 40 [i]
- linear OA(160, 2, F16, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(160, s, F16, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(160, 2, F16, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code) (see above)
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(1680, 146, F16, 2, 41) (dual of [(146, 2), 212, 42]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |