Information on Result #1317938
Linear OA(486, 110, F4, 45) (dual of [110, 24, 46]-code), using construction X with Varšamov bound based on
- linear OA(485, 108, F4, 45) (dual of [108, 23, 46]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(485, 114, F4, 45) (dual of [114, 29, 46]-code), using
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(484, 113, F4, 45) (dual of [113, 29, 46]-code), using
- a “GraCyc†code from Grassl’s database [i]
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(484, 113, F4, 45) (dual of [113, 29, 46]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(485, 114, F4, 45) (dual of [114, 29, 46]-code), using
- linear OA(485, 109, F4, 44) (dual of [109, 24, 45]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 485 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 1111 597038 762513 968470 002906 060206 587432 150068 350233 [i]
- linear OA(40, 1, F4, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(40, s, F4, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.