Information on Result #1321121
Linear OA(367, 129, F3, 24) (dual of [129, 62, 25]-code), using construction X with Varšamov bound based on
- linear OA(363, 122, F3, 24) (dual of [122, 59, 25]-code), using
- construction X with Varšamov bound [i] based on
- linear OA(352, 106, F3, 24) (dual of [106, 54, 25]-code), using
- 2 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(354, 108, F3, 26) (dual of [108, 54, 27]-code), using
- a “Gra†code from Grassl’s database [i]
- 2 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(354, 108, F3, 26) (dual of [108, 54, 27]-code), using
- linear OA(352, 111, F3, 18) (dual of [111, 59, 19]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 352 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 5 558822 195534 001668 283129 [i]
- linear OA(36, 11, F3, 5) (dual of [11, 5, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(36, 12, F3, 5) (dual of [12, 6, 6]-code), using
- extended Golay code Ge(3) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(36, 12, F3, 5) (dual of [12, 6, 6]-code), using
- linear OA(352, 106, F3, 24) (dual of [106, 54, 25]-code), using
- construction X with Varšamov bound [i] based on
- linear OA(363, 125, F3, 22) (dual of [125, 62, 23]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 363 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 693914 001416 966928 882563 523249 [i]
- linear OA(31, 4, F3, 1) (dual of [4, 3, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(31, s, F3, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.