Information on Result #1321145
Linear OA(386, 129, F3, 35) (dual of [129, 43, 36]-code), using construction X with Varšamov bound based on
- linear OA(378, 118, F3, 35) (dual of [118, 40, 36]-code), using
- 3 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(381, 121, F3, 38) (dual of [121, 40, 39]-code), using
- a “GraCyc†code from Grassl’s database [i]
- 3 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(381, 121, F3, 38) (dual of [121, 40, 39]-code), using
- linear OA(378, 121, F3, 30) (dual of [121, 43, 31]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 378 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 3 560966 043026 408563 242639 212120 261729 [i]
- linear OA(35, 8, F3, 4) (dual of [8, 3, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- Golay code G(3) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.